Reading Length | District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936)

Rules of practice in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbiaadopted by the court in general term, October 21, 1863 in pursuance of an order made July 22, 1863.

Govt. Print. Off.1863-01-01

Judge Wylie's opinion in the case of Cheever vs. Cheever and Wilson, on the effect of an Indiana divorce as to parties domiciled in the District of Columbia.

W.H. & O.H. Morrison1866-01-01

The test-oath casethe motion to rescind the rule overruled : opinions of the court and Justice Wylie : Supreme Court in general term.

s.n.1867-01-01

The Bradley Fisher difficultyJudge Fisher's action sustained.

s.n., 1867]1867-01-01

Opinions of the Court on the mandamus casesrules to show cause dismissed : names of all voters to be placed on lists : failure to register at a given time no forfeiture of the elective franchise.

s.n.1867-01-01

In the matter of the estate of Horatio Ames, deceased, on exceptions to the account of Charlotte L. Ames, adm'x, c.t.a.transcript of record from special term, probate jurisdiction.

R.O. Polkinhorn, Printer1876-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, certiorari, the Washington Market Company vs. the Commissioners under Act of 8th July, 1870for paving Pennsylvania Avenue, the Commissioners of the District of Columbia and the First National Bank of New York : at law, no. 13,846

[s.n.]1879-01-01

M.A. Dauphin vs. D.M. Key, postmaster-general, equity no. 7092brief for defendant

[s.n.]1880-01-01

The great state trialGuiteau, the assassin : full details of his trial for the murder of President James A. Garfield ; the crime, its causes and consequences ...

William Flint1881-01-01

Indictment for conspiracyUnited States vs. John W. Dorsey ... [et al.] filed May 20, 1882

[s.n.]1882-01-01

Star route casethe United States vs. Thomas J. Brady, et al. : information for conspiracy : abstract of information, motion and affidavit, argument of counsel, opinion of the court

Republican Print1882-01-01

Star route conspiracyUnited States against Thomas J. Brady and others. Opening address of George Bliss, Washington, D.C., June 2 and 5, 1882

Govt. Print. Off.1882-01-01

The United States vs. John W. Dorsey et alProceedings on motion to quash. [March 31-May 29, 1882]

Govt. print. off.1882-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, holding a criminal term, no. 14056the United States vs. Charles J. Guiteau

Government Printing Office1882-01-01

Proceedings in the second trial of the case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montfort C. Rerdell, and Thomas J. Brady. For conspiracy ... StenographersEdward D. Easton and H. H. Alexander

Govt. print. off.1883-01-01

Proceedings in the second trial of the case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montfort C. Rerdell, and Thomas J. Bradyfor conspiracy

G.P.O.1883-01-01

Legal status of building associationstheir operations discussed by the Court in general term : full text of the opinion by Judge James and remarks by other judges in the case of Burns agt. the Metropolitan Building Association ...

W.D. Wallach & Hope1884-01-01

Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbiasitting in the general term, from January, 1879, to June, 1880 ; (together with some general and special term cases of later date not heretofore reported.)

M. Curlander1884-01-01

The Hicks libel caseinstructions of Judge Cox to the jury.

C. Sexton, 1885]1885-01-01

Rules of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, adopted at the January term, 1886.

Judd & Detweiler1886-01-01

Boycotting is illegalKnights of Labor held guilty in conspiracy : the case of Krause against certain members of the Musical Assembly settled by Judge Snell yesterday.

The Washington Post Co.1887-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in General term, Ward H. Lamon and Chauncey F. Black, complainants, vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., in eq., no. 11,238, filed July 7, 1888, John H.B. Latrobe, complainant, vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., in eq., no. 11,248, filed July 13, 1888, Henry E. McKee, complainant, vs. Ellen Cochrane, et als., in eq., no. 11,262, interpleader, filed July 19, 1888brief for Ward H. Lamon and Chauncey F. Black, complainants in cause 11,238 and defendants in causes 11,248 and 11,262

[s.n.]1888-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Ward H. Lamon, et al., v. Henry E. McKee, no. 11,238, equity doc. 28

[s.n.]1888-01-01

Ward H. Lamon, et al., plaintiffs, v. Henry E. McKee, et al., defendants, equity no. 11,238, doc. 28

[s.n.]1888-01-01

Ward H. Lamon, et al., plaintiffs, v. Henry E. McKee, et al., defendantsbrief for Henry E. McKee

[s.n.]1890-01-01

Occupation of streets and avenues in the city of Washington by stands, &copinion of Justice Cox in the case District of Columbia vs. George Munroe

s.n.1890-01-01

Ward H. Lamon, et al., plaintiffs, v. H.E. McKee, et al., defendants, in equity no. 11238, Doc. 28brief and argument for defendant, H.E. McKee

[s.n.]1891-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Ward H. Lamon, et al., v. Henry E. McKee, John H.B. Latrobe, et al., no. 11238, equity docket 28, John H.B. Latrobe v. Henry E. McKee, et al., no. 11248, equity docket 28, Henry E. McKee, et al., v. Ellen Cochrane, John H.B. Latrobe, et al., no. 11,262, equity docket 28supplemental statement on behalf of Mr. Latrobe

[s.n.]1891-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in General term, January, 1891, Ward H. Lamon, et al., complainants, vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., equity no. 11,238, doc. 28, John H.B. Latrobe vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., equity no. 11,248, doc. 28reply for defendant McKee to the authorities cited by counsel for the complainants in the argument of the above entitled causes on the proposition that McKee is a trustee ex-maleficio for the complainants

[s.n.]1891-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, general term, 1891, Ward H. Lamon, et al., v. H.E. McKee, et al., J.H.B. Latrobe v. H.E. McKee, et al., H.E. McKee v. Ellen Cochrane, et albrief fo B.F. Rice

[s.n.]1891-01-01

Henry M. Baker vs. Horace S. CummingsOpinion of Mr. Justice Hagner, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, and of Chief Justice Alvey, of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, affirming and adopting Mr. Justice Hagner's opinion

W.F. Roberts1891-01-01

The mechanics' lien lawJustice Cox gives a new interpretation to some of its clauses.

Wallach & Hope1892-01-01

Rules of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, adopted at the January term, 1894.

G.P.O.1894-01-01

The Buck's Stove & Range Co., plaintiff, vs. the American Federation of Labor, et al., defendants. In Equity, No. 27,305

American Anti-Boycott Association1908-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of ColumbiaThe Buck's stove and range co. plantiff vs. The American federation of labor, et. al. defendants. Np. 27,305 equity ...

American Anti-boycott association1909-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, decree in the United States of America, v. Swift and Company and othersDepartment of Justice

G.P.O.1920-01-01

The Maynard coal co., plaintiff, vs. Federal trade commission, defendantEquity no. 37659. [Decree

1920-01-01

Statutes, rules of court and rules of the Committee on Examination for Admission of Attorneys to practice before the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia

Fred S. Lincoln, Inc.1925-01-01

The Chesapeake & Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, et al., defendantsBrief on behalf of the Chesapeake Potomac telephone company

Byron S. Adams1925-01-01

The Chesapeake & Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, et al., defendantsReply brief on behalf of the Chesapeake and Potomac telephone company

Byron S. Adams1925-01-01

Washington railway & electric company, a corporation ... plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a corporation, and Mason M. Patrick, Harleigh H. Hartman and William B. Ladueconstituting the said Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, defendants. Brief of Washington railway and electric company in support of fare increase

Byron S. Adams1930-01-01

The Chesapeake and Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, and Riley E. Elgen and John C. Gotwals, constituting the said Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, defendants. Equity no. 54,859Narrative record of testimony. Testimony of company before the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia. August 16 to ... 30, 1932

Byron S. Adams1932-01-01

The Chesapeake and Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, and Riley E. Elgen and John C. Gotwalsconstituting the said Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, defendants. Equity no. 54,859. Narrative record of testimony. Testimony (other than as to reproduction cost new) offered by Commission counsel before the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia. June 15 ... [to] September 7, 1932

Byron S. Adams1932-01-01

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, United States of America, petitioner, against George Otis Smith, respondentbrief on behalf of petitioner

The Ballou Press1932-01-01

[Uniform rules of civil procedure for the district courts of the United States and the Supreme court of the District of Columbiatentative drafts 1-3, Oct. 1935 - Mar. 1936, of the Advisory committee on rules of civil procedure appointed by the Supreme court of the United States

[s.n.]1935-01-01

The Chesapeake & Potomac telephone company, a body corporat[!], plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, and J. Franklin Bell, Cuno H. Rudolph and Frederick A. Fenning, commissioners of the District of Columbia, and as such constituting the said Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, defendantsNarrative record of testimony

Byron S. Adams

District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936)

Identifiers

Top Subjects

Books by District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936)