Survey of online and MOOC course design plans & practices
Our rough guess is there are 19,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 1 hours and 16 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 3 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
2014 - Primary Research Group, New York, New York (State)
Language
English
Word Count
19,000 words, Guess
Page Count
76 pages
Identifiers
- Internet Archivesurveyofonlinemo0000prim
- ISBN-101574402870
- ISBN-139781574402872
- Library of Congress Control Number2014938025
- OCLC Control Number876671847
and 1 more
- Open LibraryOL37875921M
Classifications
- DDC371.3344678
- LCCLB1044.87 .P75 2014
Alternate Titles
- Survey of online and MOOC course design plans and practices
Description
The study looks closely at how 21 institutions of higher education design their online courses, blended learning courses and MOOCs. Participants include McGill, the University of Rochester, the Royal Institute of Technology, UCLA, Southern Illinois University, the University of Alabama, the University of Advancing Technology, the University of Manchester, State University of New York at Brockport, Victoria University of Wellington, the University of North Carolina Greensboro, the University of Glasgow and many others. The 76-page report gives detailed data on how colleges are using classroom video, social media, "flipped" classrooms, short and frequent spot quizzes, peer mentors and other strategies to improve their online courses and MOOCs. It also provides data on the kinds and types of MOOCs in development, the timetable for their development, and how they are viewed by their institutional creators. For example, are MOOCs viewed as loss leading "feeders" to the colleges' traditional or distance education programs. The study gives hard data on the size of support staffs for MOOC and online course development and at assessment strategies for MOOCs and more traditional online and blended learning courses. The report helps its readers to answer questions such as: what kinds of cloud services and software tools are colleges using to build online courses and MOOCs? What are their budgets? If they are developing MOOCs what is the intended audience? What is the role of taped classroom lectures? Of social media? How are colleges trying to overcome the inherent inefficiencies of traditional college education?
Subjects
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!