Pollution and deception at ground zero revisited

Description

In August 2004, the Sierra Club issued a report entitled, Pollution and Deception at Ground Zero (http://www.sierraclub.org/groundzero/report.pdf), which documented that many hundreds of people in New York City had become ill because of exposure to pollution from the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center. The report found that if our federal government had responded to the disaster with proper vigilance for people's health, many toxic exposures could have been avoided. It also expressed concern that such missteps could be repeated in future disaster. In this report, the Sierra Club revisits these issues to determine whether or not Americans should feel assured that our federal government will take sufficient steps to protect health and safety in future disasters. The answer is no. Americans cannot count on the White House Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of Homeland Security, EPA or OSHA to protect public health in the aftermath of a terrorist attack or national disaster. Based on the federal administration's new emergency management policies -- and its continued failure to provide a proper cleanup and health management response to the 9/11 attack -- Americans should assume that in any future national disaster, if political press is applied to resume human activity in the affected area: (1) EPA will fail to determine how harmful the contamination is and how far it spreads; also, under its new relationship with the Department of Homeland Security, it may use weakened toxic cleanup goals under a new federal "optimization" policy; (2) Under the new National Response Plan, messages to the public about health and safety will be filtered by centralized "PR" staff who answer to an administration that has repeatedly disregarded scientific data if it conflicts with a political agenda; (3) OSHA will not enforce safety laws to protect rescue and recovery workers -- and under the new National Response Plan, OSHA will not have "the last word" in debates on worker safety; (4) The federal government will fail to conduct a proper cleanup of the contamination; (5) The federal Administration will praise, then abandon, the rescue/recovery workers and the people who return to rebuild the area but then suffer health effects; and, (6) No one will be held accountable for our government's failure to protect the public from the aftermath of a terrorist attack or national disaster. This is not what Americans deserve from their government. New York, NY: The federal agencies charged with protecting rescue workers and the public against toxic hazards in national emergencies may find their hands tied under the new National Response Plan, according to a report issued by the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club released an update of "Pollution and Deception at Ground Zero," its 2004 report on the federal administration's failure to protect the public and rescue workers against toxic pollution from the September 11th attack on the World Trade Center. The new report urges that the government missteps at Ground Zero may be repeated in future disasters. This comes as the National Response Plan examined in the report is being tested for the first time in the Southeast. "Should Americans feel assured that our federal government will do a better job of protecting health and safety in any future disaster? The answer appears to be no," said Suzanne Mattei, author of the report and Sierra Club's New York City Executive. "Health and safety agencies will not be in the drivers' seat.".

Subjects

Links

• Go to Archived Report