Indian wheat and rice sector policies and the implications of reform
Our rough guess is there are 11,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 45 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 2 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Srinivasan, P. V. - Contributor
- Landes, Maurice. - Contributor
- United States. Dept. of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. - Contributor
Publication
2007 - U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C, District of Columbia
Language
English
Word Count
11,250 words, Guess
Page Count
45 pages
Identifiers
- OCLC Control Number127108226
- Open LibraryOL17727318M
Description
During 1998-2002, India experienced record public surpluses of wheat and rice, sharply higher government grain subsidy outlays, and declining per capita consumption of wheat and rice. By 2006, despite continued high subsidies and sluggish domestic consumption, India developed a large wheat deficit because of reduced price incentives, weak yield growth, and rising subsidized consumption. The pronounced market cycles and declining per capita consumption for India's major food staples are creating pressure for Indian policymakers to adjust longstanding policies. While there has been no political consensus on more fundamental reform, recent policy changes have moved toward better targeting of food subsidies to low-income consumers, decentralization of government operations, and slowed growth in producer price subsidies. Decentralization is likely to reduce government costs with little impact on producers, consumers, or trade. Lower price supports would aid consumers at the cost of producers, and sharply lower government costs. Adoption of a U.S.-style deficiency payment program could maintain producer support with less market distortion and lower cost, but would require devising a viable system to make and monitor farmer payments.
Subjects
Topics
Places
Links
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!