Rethinking Expertise
Our rough guess is there are 40,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 2 hours and 40 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 6 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Publication
2007-10-01 - University Of Chicago Press
Language
English
Word Count
40,000 words, Guess
Page Count
160 pages
Physical Format
Hardcover
Identifiers
- Internet Archiverethinkingexpert00harr
- Internet Archiverethinkingexpert00coll
- Internet Archiverethinkingexpert00coll_142
- ISBN-100226113604
- ISBN-139780226113609
and 6 more
- Goodreads2071271
- LibraryThing4730967
- Library of Congress Control Number2007022671
- OCLC Control Number141187914
- Better World Books9780226113609
- Open LibraryOL9562491M
Classifications
- LCCHM651.C64 2007
- LCCHM651 .C64 2007
Description
"What does it mean to be an expert? Traditionally, expertise has been associated with authoritative knowledge, honed by practice and certified by powerful institutions. Scientists, of course, are often presumed to be the ultimate experts, but it is exactly in this area that the importance of defining what it means to be an expert is paramount. In Rethinking Expertise, Harry Collins and Robert Evans offer a radical new perspective on the role of expertise in the practice of science and the public evaluation of technology." "Collins and Evans present the problem of expertise in the context of modern society and go on to offer a Periodic Table of Expertises based on the idea of tacit knowledge - in other words, knowledge that we have but cannot explain. They then explore how some expertises are used to judge others, how we judge between experts even when we are not experts ourselves, and how credentials are used to judge experts. A central new concept in the book and, the authors argue, in society, is interactional expertise - a proficiency in the language of a specialism if not in its practices. Here, they describe experiments in which people with interactional expertise showed themselves to be indistinguishable from full-fledged experts in imitation games." "Throughout, Collins and Evans ask an important question: how can the public make use of science and technology before there is consensus in the scientific community? This is a quandary that has wide implications for public policy and for those who seek to understand and benefit from science. The authors offer a balanced assessment of the main issues and propose a new understanding of how to extend public participation in technical decision-making without abandoning the idea of expertise as real, useful, and necessary.". "Rethinking Expertise will be of interest to scientists and scholars in science studies but will also have implications for decision makers and experts across many fields - in technology, education, sociology, legal studies, psychology, philosophy, computer engineering, and business."--BOOK JACKET.
Subjects
Topics
Similar Books
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!