Solar Calendar, And Other Ways of Marking Time
Our rough guess is there are 87,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 5 hours and 48 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 12 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
punctum books, Earth, Milky Way, No place, unknown, or undetermined
Language
English
Word Count
87,000 words, Guess
Page Count
348 pages
Identifiers
- ISBN-139780998531830
- ISBN-100998531839
- Open LibraryOL28354753M
Description
At the end of his life, Pierre Hadot was a professor at the Collège de France ? a ?professor?s professor? ? and he helped Michel Foucault, most famously, conceptualize ethics. Hadot devoted his career to recovering the ancient conception of philosophy, according to which the discourses of universities are but a fragment of what philosophy is. His engagement with this theme helped Bendik-Keymer understand and develop a personal counter-culture to his academic work, a kind of original academics truer to the idea of the philosophical school Plato first developed in his ?????µ???. But while Plato?s school developed a useful form of life, it had an ambivalent relation to democracy and to everyday people. Whereas Plato was in some ways one of the first egalitarians by merit (especially concerning women), he was also deeply classist in his categorization of intellectual potentials. He effectively thought some people were stupid by nature, having no philosophical worth. Hence the ?????µ??? existed outside the city, in practice exclusive and somewhat sequestered. To some extent, Plato?s vision of philosophy ? at least as explained by Hadot ? had the practical point of philosophy right, but this point still needed to be rendered thoroughly democratic in the polyphony and multiple intelligences of people. Doing so coheres with what Foucault was after in his application of Hadot. It is also what Bendik-Keymer is after ? to extract what is good from original academics and make it democratic, as opposed to dumbing people down.
Subjects
Topics
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!