Civil religion
a dialogue in the history of political philosophy
Our rough guess is there are 112,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 7 hours and 28 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 15 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
2010 - Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, New York (State)
Language
English
Word Count
112,000 words, Guess
Page Count
448 pages
Identifiers
- Internet Archivecivilreligiondia0000bein
- ISBN-100521506360
- ISBN-139780521506366
- Library of Congress Control Number2010015173
- OCLC Control Number608296728
and 2 more
- Better World Books9780521506366
- Open LibraryOL24468649M
Classifications
- DDC320.01
- LCCJA81 .B35 2010
- LCCJA81 .B35 2011
Description
"Civil Religion offers philosophical commentaries on more than twenty thinkers stretching from the sixteenth to the twentieth century. The book examines four important traditions within the history of modern political philosophy and delves into how each of them addresses the problem of religion. Two of these traditions pursue projects of domesticating religion. The civil religion tradition, principally defined by Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau, seeks to domesticate religion by putting it solidly in the service of politics. The liberal tradition pursues an alternative strategy of domestication by seeking to put as much distance as possible between religion and politics. Modern theocracy is a militant reaction against liberalism, and it reverses the relationship of subordination asserted by civil religion: it puts politics directly in the service of religion. Finally, a fourth tradition is defined by Nietzsche and Heidegger. Aspects of their thought are not just modern, but hyper-modern, yet they manifest an often-hysterical reaction against liberalism that is fundamentally shared with the theocratic tradition. Together, these four traditions compose a vital dialogue that carries us to the heart of political philosophy itself"--
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!