Kant's Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals
a commentary
Our rough guess is there are 94,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 6 hours and 17 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 13 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
2011 - Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
Language
English
Word Count
94,250 words, Guess
Page Count
377 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL25298797M
- ISBN-139780199691531
- ISBN-100199691541
- OCLC Control Number709682919
- OCLC Control Numberkantsgroundworkf00alli
and 1 more
- Library of Congress Control Number2011934691
Classifications
- DDC170
- LCCB2766.Z7 A45 2011
Description
"Henry E. Allison presents a comprehensive commentary on Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). It differs from most recent commentaries in paying special attention to the structure of the work, the historical context in which it was written, and the views to which Kant was responding. Allison argues that, despite its relative brevity, the Groundwork is the single most important work in modern moral philosophy and that its significance lies mainly in two closely related factors. The first is that it is here that Kant first articulates his revolutionary principle of the autonomy of the will, that is, the paradoxical thesis that moral requirements (duties) are self-imposed and that it is only in virtue of this that they can be unconditionally binding. The second is that for Kant all other moral theories are united by the assumption that the ground of moral requirements must be located in some object of the will (the good) rather than the will itself, which Kant terms heteronomy. Accordingly, what from the standpoint of previous moral theories was seen as a fundamental conflict between various views of the good is reconceived by Kant as a family quarrel between various forms of hereronomy, none of which are capable of accounting for the unconditionally binding nature of morality. Allison goes on to argue that Kant expresses this incapacity by claiming that the various forms of heteronomy unavoidably reduce the categorical to a merely hypothetical imperative."--P. [4] of cover.
Subjects
People
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!