Review of the current state of radiation protection philosophy
recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
Our rough guess is there are 12,500 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 50 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 2 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Publication
1975 - The Council, Washington, District of Columbia
Language
English
Word Count
12,500 words, Guess
Page Count
50 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL5065515M
- ISBN-100913392251
- OCLC Control Number3242698
- OCLC Control Numberreviewofcurrents0000nati
- Library of Congress Control Number74031940
and 1 more
- Goodreads2112208
Classifications
- DDC614.8/39
- LCCRA569 .N353 1975
Alternate Titles
- Radiation protection philosophy.
Description
"This report is a position statement of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) on issues that have emerged as a result of the 'recent' (1972) publication of reports by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation and the National Academy of Sciences Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations treating the estimation of the risks arising from exposure to ionizing radiation. Although these 'recently' published materials have essentially reached the same numerical results for radiation levels at which observations are available, there have been differences in philosophy and divergent conclusions regarding the estimation of the risk associated with low-level, low dose rate radiation, for which little or no data are available. Further, and perhaps more importantly, widely varying interpretations of the significance and meaning of these reports and conclusions have been formulated. In an endeavor to consider carefully the implications of the various 'new' recommendations in relation to 'current' NCRP radiation protection philosophy, the Board of Directors of the Council determined to undertake an intensive analysis of the published materials and the underlying background. To initiate this work, the NCRP constituted the Ad Hoc Committee on Comparison of Radiation Protection Philosophies. The Committee developed background material for consideration of this topic by the Board of Directors of the Council. The Board determined that a formulation of the NCRP's position would constitute an important contribution and, utilizing the material developed by the Ad Hoc Committee, together with review by the Council, produced this report." --From Preface, page iii.
Subjects
Series Statement
- NCRP report ; no. 43
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!