The next Justice
repairing the Supreme Court appointments process
Our rough guess is there are 59,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 3 hours and 59 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 8 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Publication
2007 - Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, New Jersey
Language
English
Word Count
59,750 words, Guess
Page Count
239 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL17915066M
- ISBN-139780691134970
- OCLC Control Number124074888
- OCLC Control Numbernextjusticerepai00eisg
- Library of Congress Control Number2007018609
and 2 more
- Goodreads1341029
- LibraryThing4193748
Classifications
- DDC347.73/2634
- LCCKF8742 .E357 2007
Description
"The Supreme Court appointments process is broken, and the timing couldn't be worse - for liberals or conservatives. The Court is just one more solid conservative justice away from an ideological sea change - a hard-right turn on an array of issues that affect every American, from abortion to environmental protection. But neither those who look at this prospect with pleasure nor those who view it with horror will be able to make informed judgments about the next nominee to the Court - unless the appointments process is fixed now. In The Next Justice, Christopher Eisgruber proposes a way to do just that. He describes a new and better manner of deliberating about who should serve on the Court - an approach that puts the burden on nominees to show that their judicial philosophies and politics are acceptable to senators and citizens alike. And he makes a new case for the virtue of judicial moderates." "Long on partisan rancor and short on serious discussion, today's appointments process reveals little about what kind of judge a nominee might make. Eisgruber argues that the solution is to investigate how nominees would answer a basic question about the Court's role: When and why is it beneficial for judges to trump the decisions of elected officials? Through an examination of the politics and history of the Court, Eisgruber demonstrates that pursuing this question would reveal far more about nominees than do other tactics, such as investigating their views of specific precedents or the framers' intentions."--Jacket.
Subjects
Topics
Places
Other Editions
- The next Justice: repairing the Supreme Court appointments process
Similar Books
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!