When does labor scarcity encourage innovation?
Our rough guess is there are 9,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 37 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 1 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics - Contributor
Publication
2009 - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
9,250 words, Guess
Page Count
37 pages
Identifiers
- Internet Archivewhendoeslaborsca00acem
- OCLC Control Number671763306
- Open LibraryOL24647017M
Description
This paper studies the conditions under which the scarcity of a factor (in particular, labor) encourages technological progress and technology adoption. In standard endogenous growth models, which feature a strong scale effect, an increase in the supply of labor encourages technological progress. In contrast, the famous Habakkuk hypothesis in economic history claims that technological progress was more rapid in 19th-century United States than in Britain because of labor scarcity in the former country. Similar ideas are often suggested as possible reasons for why high wages might have encouraged rapid adoption of certain technologies in continental Europe over the past several decades, and as a potential reason for why environmental regulations can spur more rapid innovation. I present a general framework for the analysis of these questions. I define technology as strongly labor saving if the aggregate production function of the economy exhibits decreasing differences in the appropriate index of technology, theta, and labor. Conversely, technology is strongly labor complementary if the production function exhibits increasing differences in theta and labor. The main result of the paper shows that labor scarcity will encourage technological advances if technology is strongly labor saving. In contrast, labor scarcity will discourage technological advances if technology is strongly labor complementary. I provide examples of environments in which technology can be strongly labor saving and also show that such a result is not possible in certain canonical macroeconomic models. These results clarify the conditions under which labor scarcity and high wages encourage technological advances and the reason why such results were obtained or conjectured in certain settings, but do not always apply in many models used in the growth literature. Keywords: Habakkuk hypothesis, high wages, innovation, labor scarcity, technological change. JEL Classifications: O30, O31, O33, C65.
Subjects
Series Statement
- Working paper series / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics -- working paper 09-07
- Working paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics) -- no. 09-07.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!