The politics of historical vision
Marx, Foucault, Habermas
Our rough guess is there are 73,500 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 54 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 10 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Publication
1995 - Guilford Press, New York, USA, New York (State)
Language
English
Word Count
73,500 words, Guess
Page Count
294 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL1118655M
- ISBN-100898628512
- OCLC Control Number31607318
- OCLC Control Numberpoliticshistoric00best
- Library of Congress Control Number94044894
and 2 more
- LibraryThing379271
- Goodreads1608325
Classifications
- DDC320/.01/1
- LCCJA74 .B474 1995
Description
This work offers a detailed comparison of the historical visions of both Foucault and Habermas, using Marx as a modernist contrast. The book clearly illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of each thinker's theory for the productive analysis of history and society, relating the work of each to current debates over modern and postmodern theory. While Steven Best engages these debates throughout the book, he challenges the claim that there are sharp lines of difference between the modern and the postmodern. Instead, he argues that the differences between Foucault and Habermas, both in relation to each other and to Marx, are best understood as competing responses within modern theory itself - responses that attempt to articulate Hegelian and Nietzschean visions of history. Avoiding partisan defenses of one theorist over another, Best shows that the problems of each are illuminated through the perspectives of the others.
First Sentence
Karl Marx lived and wrote during what he understood to be the most momentous social transformation in the history of humanity - the emergence of capitalist modernity.
Description
This work offers a detailed comparison of the historical visions of both Foucault and Habermas, using Marx as a modernist contrast. The book clearly illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of each thinker's theory for the productive analysis of history and society, relating the work of each to current debates over modern and postmodern theory. While Steven Best engages these debates throughout the book, he challenges the claim that there are sharp lines of difference between the modern and the postmodern. Instead, he argues that the differences between Foucault and Habermas, both in relation to each other and to Marx, are best understood as competing responses within modern theory itself - responses that attempt to articulate Hegelian and Nietzschean visions of history. Avoiding partisan defenses of one theorist over another, Best shows that the problems of each are illuminated through the perspectives of the others.
Subjects
Topics
Series Statement
- Critical perspectives
Other Editions
- The politics of historical vision: Marx, Foucault, Habermas
Similar Books
Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate
edited by Michael Kelly.
The Muqaddimah
Ibn Khaldūn, عبد الرحمن ابن خلدون Abdel Rahman Ibn Khaldun
Michel Foucault: form and power
Dan Beer
Foucault and Classical Antiquity: Power, Ethics and Knowledge (Modern European Philosophy)
Wolfgang Detel
To the Finland station: a study in the writing and acting of history.
With a new introd.
Between past and future: eight exercises in political thought
Hannah Arendt.
Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse and Authenticity in Being and Time (Modern European Philosophy)
Taylor Carman
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!