Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning (Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion)
Our rough guess is there are 58,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 3 hours and 52 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 8 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Word Count
58,000 words, Guess
Page Count
232 pages
Physical Format
Paperback
Identifiers
- Internet Archivegodwithoutsupern0000forr
- ISBN-100801481147
- ISBN-139780801481147
- Library of Congress Control Number96001044
- OCLC Control Number34194229
and 3 more
- Better World Books9780801481147
- Better World BooksP8-DHU-593
- Open LibraryOL7848931M
Classifications
- LCCBL200.F65 1996
Description
Peter Forrest expounds a program of best-explanation apologetics. He contends that since the existence of God would provide the best possible explanation of various facts, those facts support theism. Among the facts cited are the suitability of the universe for life, the regularity of the universe, the human capacity for intellectual progress, the experience of a moral order, and various forms of beauty. The beauty that interests Forrest as evidence for the existence of God includes sensuous beauty; the beauty of the natural order, as revealed by the sciences; and the beauty of necessity discovered by mathematicians. In addressing the need for an adequate motive for creation, Forrest conjectures that God created the universe for embodied persons not for their life on earth alone but also for an afterlife. Forrest acknowledges the speculative nature of such an account. He suggests that philosophical speculation is also required to defend theism against the charge that it is too extravagant a hypothesis to be warranted. Providing a speculative defense against the argument from evil, he explains how such speculations can be used to support best-explanation arguments without the conclusions themselves being rendered purely speculative.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!