A big apple for educators
New York City's experiment with schoolwide performance bonuses : final evaluation report
Our rough guess is there are 69,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 36 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 9 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Word Count
69,000 words, Guess
Page Count
276 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL24885678M
- ISBN-139780833052513
- OCLC Control Number732967779
- OCLC Control Numberbigappleforeduca00mars
- Library of Congress Control Number2011023662
Classifications
- DDC371.1009747
- LCCLB2842.4.N7 B54 2011
Description
"In the 2007-2008 school year, the New York City Department of Education and the United Federation of Teachers jointly implemented the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program in a random sample of the city's high-needs public schools. The program lasted for three school years, and its broad objective was to improve student performance through school-based financial incentives. The question, of course, was whether it was doing so. To examine its implementation and effects, the department tasked a RAND Corporation-led partnership with the National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University to conduct a two-year study of the program that would offer an independent assessment. This report describes the results of our analyses for all three years of the program, from 2007-2008 through 2009-2010. This work built on past research and was guided by a theory of action articulated by program leaders. Researchers examined student test scores; teacher, school staff, and administrator surveys; and interviews with administrators, staff members, program sponsors, and union and district officials. The researchers found that the program did not, by itself, improve student achievement, perhaps in part because conditions needed to motivate staff were not achieved (e.g., understanding, buy-in for the bonus criteria) and because of the high level of accountability pressure all the schools already faced."--Page 4 of cover.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!