An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted

to which are prefixed the proceedings of the House on Mr. Peddle's petition : Part the First