Philoponus On Aristotle On coming-to-be and perishing 1.1-5
Our rough guess is there are 48,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 3 hours and 15 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 7 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Contributions
- Williams, Christopher John Fards. - Contributor
Publication
1999 - Duckworth, London, England
Language
English
Word Count
48,750 words, Guess
Page Count
195 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL6823212M
- ISBN-100715628526
- OCLC Control Number41968246
- OCLC Control Number855709488
- Library of Congress Control Number00304288
and 1 more
- Goodreads5773432
Classifications
- LCCQ151.A63 P47213 1999b
Alternate Titles
- On Aristotle On coming-to-be and perishing 1.1-5
- On coming-to-be and perishing 1.1-5
Description
The first five chapters of Aristotle's De Generatione et Corruptione distinguish creation and destruction from mere qualitative change and from growth. They include a fascinating debate about the atomists' analysis of creation and destruction as due to the rearrangement of indivisible atoms. Aristotle's rival belief in the infinite divisibility of matter is explained and defended against the atomists' powerful attack on infinite divisibility. But what inspired Philoponus most in his commentary is the topic of organic growth. How does it take place without ingested matter getting into the same place as the growing body? And how is personal identity preserved, if our matter is always in flux, and our form depends on our matter? If we do not depend on the persistence of matter why are we not immortal? Analogous problems of identity arise also for inanimate beings. Philoponus draws out a brief remark of Aristotle's to show that cause need not be like effect. For example, what makes something hard may be cold, not hard. This goes against a persistent philosophical prejudice, but Philoponus makes it plausible that Aristotle recognized this truth. These topics of identity over time and the principles of causation are still matters of intense discussion.
Subjects
People
Series Statement
- [The Ancient commentators on Aristotle]
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!