Do firm boundaries matter?
Our rough guess is there are 3,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 12 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 1 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Scharfstein, David - Contributor
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics - Contributor
Publication
2001 - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
3,000 words, Guess
Page Count
12 pages
Identifiers
- Internet Archivedofirmboundaries00mull
- OCLC Control Number49802670
- Open LibraryOL24639553M
Description
In his famous article, "The Nature of the Firm," Ronald Coase (1937) raised two fundamental questions that have spawned a large body of research: Do firm boundaries affect the allocation of resources? And, what determines where firm boundaries are drawn? While the first of these questions has received some theoretical attention - notably Oliver Williamson (1975, 1985), Benjamin Klein, Robert Crawford, and Armen Alchian (1978) and Sanford Grossman and Oliver Hart, (1986) - it has largely been ignored empirically. Instead, the empirical work in this area, discussed in the other articles in this session, has addressed the second question by analyzing the determinants of vertical integration. Thus, while we know something about the forces that determine firm boundaries, we know relatively little about how these boundaries affect actual firm behavior. This is a major limitation in our understanding of the nature of the firm. To begin to assess how firm boundaries affect behavior, we analyze whether there are differences between integrated and non-integrated chemical manufacturers in their investments in production capacity. We focus on producers of vinyl chloride monomer (VCM), the sole use of which is in the production of the widely used waterproof plastic, polyvinyl chloride (PVC). VCM is a homogenous commodity and is traded in relatively liquid markets. Moreover, there is no obvious production link between VCM and PVC other than that one is an input into the other. For example, PVC is not a by-product of VCM production. Nevertheless, two thirds of VCM producers in our sample are integrated downstream into PVC. The existing literature would ask why we observe this degree of integration. We ask instead whether integrated and non-integrated VCM producers invest differently in production capacity.
Subjects
Series Statement
- Working paper series / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics -- working paper 01-05
- Working paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics) -- no. 01-05.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!