Developing army leaders
lessons for teaching critical thinking in distributed, resident, and mixed-delivery venues
Our rough guess is there are 25,500 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 1 hours and 42 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 4 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Arroyo Center - Contributor
- Rand Corporation - Contributor
Publication
2014 - Rand/Arroyo Center, Santa Monica, California, California
Language
English
Word Count
25,500 words, Guess
Page Count
102 pages
Identifiers
- ISBN-100833081527
- ISBN-139780833081520
- Library of Congress Control Number2014933036
- OCLC Control Number870842055
- Open LibraryOL30388158M
Classifications
- LCCU408.3 .S77 2014
Description
The U.S. Army uses the Command and General Staff Officer Course (CGSOC) as a key component of its system for developing critical thinking skills and abilities in its officer corps. The Common Core is the first phase of CGSOC. The Common Core is taught in three venues: a resident course taught at Fort Leavenworth and at satellite campuses; Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL), a web-based, self-paced course that uses interactive multimedia instruction; and The Army School System (TASS), primarily for Reserve Component officers, which combines resident and interactive multimedia instruction and is taught by the U.S. Army Reserve Command's 97th Brigade and its three subordinate battalions. CGSOC consists of nine blocks of instruction taught as stand-alone modules in the resident course (14-16 weeks long) and organized into three phases in TASS and ADL (designed to be taken over a period of up to 18 months). In response to the interests of Army leadership, this study sought to answer the following questions about the Common Core, focusing on the 2009-2010 academic year: Based on current methods of evaluation, how effective is the Common Core, and to what extent are there differences among distributed, resident, and mixed-delivery venues? Based on current measures, how can course delivery be improved? How well do current methods of evaluation gauge course success and point to needed improvements? To answer these questions, the authors analyzed available data from Command and General Staff School, including responses to student surveys, grades on assignments, and student characteristics. In addition, the authors conducted a quasi-experimental study to assess consistency in grading among faculty members.
Subjects
Series Statement
- Research report
- Research report (Rand Corporation)
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!