Philosophical Foundations of Neurolaw
Our rough guess is there are 55,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 3 hours and 41 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 8 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Publication
2017 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated
Language
English
Word Count
55,250 words, Guess
Page Count
221 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL34640025M
- ISBN-139781498539661
- OCLC Control Number1004849093
- Library of Congress Control Number2017044081
Classifications
- LCCK3601.R67 2017
Description
"As neuroscience continues to reveal the biological basis of human thought and behavior, what impact will this have on legal theory and practice? The emerging field of neurolaw seeks to address this question, but doing so adequately requires confronting difficult philosophical issues surrounding the nature of mind, free will, rationality, and responsibility. [This book] claims that the central philosophical issue facing neurolaw is whether we can reconcile the conception of ourselves as free, rational, and responsible agents with the conception of ourselves as complex bio-chemical machines. [The author] argues that we can reconcile these conceptions. To show this, [the author] develops and defends an account of free will that identifies free will with the capacity to respond to rational demands, and he argues that this capacity is at the foundation of our thinking about responsibility. [The author] also shows how the mind sciences can explain this capacity, thus revealing that a purely physical system can have the kind of free will that is relevant to responsible agency. Along the way, [the author] critiques a number of arguments that purport to show that the kind of reconciliation provided is not possible. [The author] concludes that though we should rethink our legal system in important ways, both in light of his account of free will and what neuroscience is poised to reveal, neuroscience does not threaten the law's core commitment to responsible agency."--
Subjects
Other Editions
- Philosophical Foundations of Neurolaw
Similar Books
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!