Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations
An Attempt at a Critical Rationalist Appraisal
Our rough guess is there are 73,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 55 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 10 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Word Count
73,750 words, Guess
Page Count
295 pages
Physical Format
Hardcover
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL27772295M
- ISBN-139783030001162
- ISBN-103030001164
- OCLC Control Number1047652209
- Amazon3030001164
Classifications
- LCCB1-5802
Description
This book collects 13 papers that expore Wittgenstein's philosophy throughout the different stages of his career. The author writes from the viewpoint of critical rationalism. The tone of his analysis is friendly and appreciative yet critical. Of these papers, seven are on the background to the philosophy of Wittgenstein. Five papers examine different aspects of it: one on the philosophy of young Wittgenstein, one on his transitional period, and the final three on the philosophy of mature Wittgenstein, chiefly his Philosophical Investigations. The last of these papers, which serves as the concluding chapter, concerns the analytical school of philosophy that grew chiefly under its influence. Wittgenstein's posthumous Philosophical Investigations ignores formal languages while retianing the view of metaphysics as meaningless - declaring that all languages are metaphysics-free. It was very popular in the middle of the twentieth century. Now it is passé. Wittgenstein had hoped to dissolve all philosophical disputes, yet he generated a new kind of dispute. His claim to have improved the philosophy of life is awkward just becasue he prevented philosophical discussion from the ability to achieve that: he cut the branch on which he was sitting. This, according to the author, is the most serious critique of Wittgenstein.
Similar Books
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!