Sustaining U.S. leadership in the Asia-Pacific region
why a strategy of direct defense against antiaccess and area denial threats is desirable and feasible
Our rough guess is there are 4,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 19 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 1 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Publication
2015 - RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, California
Language
English
Word Count
4,750 words, Guess
Page Count
19 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL62311932M
- OCLC Control Number905204858
Classifications
- LCCUA23 .O28 2015
Alternate Titles
- Sustaining United States leadership in the Asia-Pacific region
- Sustaining US leadership in the Asia-Pacific region
- Sustaining U. S. leadership in the Asia-Pacific region
Description
"Trends in the capabilities of conventional military forces have, from the perspective of the United States, been moving in an unfavorable direction over the past decade or more. While the United States has been occupied with recent military operations, other potential adversaries have been advancing their own military capabilities. The proliferation of advanced antiaccess and area denial capabilities is a source of particular concern. A debate over the appropriate set of responses -- strategic, operational, and technical -- has begun. This perspective is intended to contribute to this debate by examining a potentially effective and feasible overall military approach to the challenge -- direct defense -- describing the general sorts of operational concepts and supporting capabilities that can enable that approach. Direct defense is predicated on the belief that the most credible way to assure partners and deter aggression is to confront potential aggressors with the prospect of failure should they seek to advance their objectives through force of arms. While many other steps can be taken to reduce the risks of conflict between the United States and potential adversaries (e.g., enhancements to allied self-defense capabilities and improved mechanisms for dispute resolution and crisis management), clarity about the U.S. commitment to direct defense and a visible investment in the requisite capabilities are essential. The ideas offered here suggest the main elements of a way forward for U.S. and allied defense planners."--Provided by publisher.
Subjects
Series Statement
- Perspective, expert insights on a timely policy issue
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!