Acts of Arguing
A Rhetorical Model of Argument (Suny Series in Logic and Language)
Our rough guess is there are 61,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 5 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 8 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
1999-12-01 - State University of New York Press
Language
English
Word Count
61,250 words, Guess
Page Count
245 pages
Physical Format
Paperback
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL7802200M
- ISBN-139780791443880
- ISBN-100791443884
- OCLC Control Number41076145
- OCLC Control Numberactsofarguingrhe00tind
and 3 more
- Library of Congress Control Number99015028
- Goodreads7227798
- LibraryThing3092639
Classifications
- LCCBC177 .T533 1999
Description
Approaches recent innovations in argumentation theory from a primarily rhetorical perspective. The revival of argumentation theory in the past few decades has focused on its logical and dialectical dimensions, with less attention paid to rhetorical features. This book explores and then redresses this imbalance. Tindale examines important logical and dialectical innovations in recent argumentation theory and shows that they depend implicitly upon rhetorical features of argument that have been suppressed in the account. This is illustrated using two extended case studies, one looking at Shell International's defense of its actions in Nigeria after the death of Ken Saro-Wiwa, and the other exploring the uses of character-based argument and testimony in a Holocaust-denial text and legal trial. In addition to the case studies, two chapters treat serious problems that plague current argumentation theory. The first concerns the nature of fallacy; the second concerns the ties between traditional argumentation and a model of rationality that has been seriously critiqued by feminist and postmodernist scholars. In both instances, the discussion indicates how a rhetorical approach to argumentation offers fresh insights and suggests responses to the questions raised. "The importance of this book lies in Tindale's ability to synthesize existing insights--primarily those of Aristotle and Perelman, but many others as well--into a rhetorical theory of argumentation, all the while adding new elements which he has fashioned himself. What Tindale does is sketch, then elaborate a relatively comprehensive model of argument which is fundamentally rhetorical. And he does this well." -- Michael Wreen, Marquette University
Description
"The revival of argumentation theory in the past few decades has focused on its logical and dialectical dimensions, with less attention paid to rhetorical features. This book explores and then redresses this imbalance. Tindale examines important logical and dialectical innovations in recent argumentation theory and shows that they depend implicitly upon rhetorical features of argument that have been suppressed in the account. This is illustrated using two extended case studies, one looking at Shell International's defense of its actions in Nigeria after the death of Ken Saro-Wiwa, and the other exploring the uses of character-based argument and testimony in a Holocaust-denial text and legal trial."--BOOK JACKET.
Subjects
Other Editions
- Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument (Suny Series in Logic and Language)
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!