The four color theorem
history, topological foundations, and idea of proof
Our rough guess is there are 65,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 20 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 9 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Contributions
- Fritsch, Gerda. - Contributor
Publication
1998 - Springer, New York, New York (State)
Language
English
Word Count
65,000 words, Guess
Page Count
260 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL352477M
- ISBN-100387984976
- OCLC Control Number38411098
- OCLC Control Numberfourcolortheorem00frit
- Library of Congress Control Number98011967
and 2 more
- Goodreads1768731
- LibraryThing2200504
Classifications
- DDC511/.5
- LCCQA612.19 .F7513 1998
Description
This elegant little book discusses a famous problem that helped to define the field now known as graph theory: what is the minimum number of colors required to print a map such that no two adjoining countries have the same color, no matter how convoluted their boundaries are. Many famous mathematicians have worked on the problem, but the proof eluded formulation until the 1970s, when it was finally cracked with a brute-force approach using a computer. The Four-Color Theorem begins by discussing the history of the problem up to the new approach given in the 1990s (by Neil Robertson, Daniel Sanders, Paul Seymour, and Robin Thomas). The book then goes into the mathematics, with a detailed discussion of how to convert the originally topological problem into a combinatorial one that is both elementary enough that anyone with a basic knowledge of geometry can follow it and also rigorous enough that a mathematician can read it with satisfaction. The authors discuss the mathematics and point to the philosophical debate that ensued when the proof was announced: just what is a mathematical proof, if it takes a computer to provide one - and is such a thing a proof at all?
Subjects
Topics
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!