Comparing environmental risks
tools for setting government priorities
Our rough guess is there are 39,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 2 hours and 37 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 5 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Contributions
- Davies, J. Clarence. - Contributor
Publication
1995 - Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, District of Columbia
Language
English
Word Count
39,250 words, Guess
Page Count
157 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL807882M
- ISBN-100915707799
- OCLC Control Number603718219
- OCLC Control Number33667943
- OCLC Control Numbercomparingenviron0000unse
and 3 more
- Library of Congress Control Number95044579
- LibraryThing4593829
- Goodreads2521188
Classifications
- DDC363.1/056
- LCCGE145 .C65 1996
Description
The budgetary squeeze occurring at all levels of government in the 1990s has made it obvious that the nation cannot address every existing and prospective environmental problem. Criticism of current programs focuses especially on the low levels of risk posed by many of the problems being subjected to regulation while more important problems may go unaddressed. Comparative risk assessment is increasingly advanced as the appropriate means for setting realistic priorities. Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting Government Priorities illuminates the increased efforts of the executive branch of the federal government to use risk assessment in its decisionmaking. While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pioneered the use of comparative risk assessment (CRA) in its programs and routinely uses risk assessments of individual pollutants, the agency has not made use of CRA throughout the full range of its activities. Nor has any other federal agency. The President's Office of Science and Technology Policy has sought the assistance of Resources for the Future in formulating methods to make broader use of CRA throughout the executive branch. RFF's Center for Risk Management commissioned background papers from leading experts on CRA for presentation at a meeting with federal regulatory officials in February 1994. Comparing Environmental Risks presents the papers of this workshop, revised to include input from the meeting. The book outlines the evolution of CRA and its surrounding controversy, summarizes lessons learned from past efforts at implementation, and identifies new ways for using CRA. Representing the state of the art on programmatic CRA, the methodological analyses and practical recommendations contained in Comparing Environmental Risks will be invaluable to all public officials and other analysts faced with the challenge of setting environmental priorities. Interested members of the public will also receive insight into an increasingly important public policy tool.
First Sentence
Early in 1987 a small group of people met in the office of the administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Excerpt
Early in 1987 a small group of people met in the office of the administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Subjects
Topics
Other Editions
- Comparing environmental risks: tools for setting government priorities
Show 1 more editions
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!