Author

Publication

2006 - Universitätsverlag Göttingen

Word Count

0 words, Guess

Page Count

0 pages

Identifiers

Description

Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on “self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care facilities is recquired and also improvements of care in nursing homes as well as offers to improve the integration of members into care. These claims conclude the discussion between assistance in dying (indirect euthanasia), and assistance to die (active and passive euthanasia). Taking account historical, interdisciplinary and comparative law issues it is demonstrated that the formal legal distinction between the various case groups of euthanasia not sufficiently takes into account the social dimension of dying.

Subjects

Topics

LawCriminal law & procedureEthical issues: euthanasia & right to die

Links

Reader Reviews

No reviews yet for this book.

Be the first to share your thoughts!