Politics or principle?
filibustering in the United States Senate
Our rough guess is there are 61,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 7 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 8 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Smith, Steven S., 1953- - Contributor
Publication
1997 - Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C, District of Columbia
Language
English
Word Count
61,750 words, Guess
Page Count
247 pages
Identifiers
- ISBN-100815709528
- ISBN-10081570951X
- ISBN-139780815709527
- ISBN-139780815709510
- Goodreads4811924', '4694154
Classifications
- DDC328.73/071
- LCCJK1161 .B56 1997
Description
Is American democracy being derailed by the United States Senate filibuster? Is the filibuster an important right that improves the political process or an increasingly partisan tool that delays legislation and thwarts the will of the majority? Are century-old procedures in the Senate hampering the institution in fulfilling its role on the eve of the twenty-first century? The authors examine the evolution of the rules governing Senate debate, analyze the consequences of these rules, and evaluate reform proposals. They argue that in an era of unprecedented filibustering and related obstructionism, old habits are indeed undermining the Senate's ability to meet its responsibilities. Binder and Smith scrutinize conventional wisdom about the filibuster - and show that very little of it is true. They focus on five major myths: that unlimited debate is a fundamental right that differentiates the Senate from the House of Representatives; that the Senate's tradition as a deliberative body requires unlimited debate; that the filibuster was once reserved for a few issues of the utmost national importance; that few measures are actually killed by filibuster; and that senators resist changing the rules because of a principled commitment to deliberation. In reappraising conventional wisdom about the filibuster, Binder and Smith contribute to ongoing debates about the dynamics of institutional change in the American political system. The authors conclude by suggesting reforms intended to enhance the power of determined majorities while preserving the rights of chamber minorities. They advocate, for example, reducing the number of votes required to end debate while increasing the amount of time for senators to debate controversial bills. Reform that is consistent with the Senate's unique size and responsibilities is possible, they suggest.
Subjects
Topics
Places
Other Editions
- Politics or principle?: filibustering in the United States Senate
Similar Books
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!