The 25 years of philosophy
a systematic reconstruction
Our rough guess is there are 102,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 6 hours and 48 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 14 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Publication
2012 - Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
102,000 words, Guess
Page Count
408 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL25067073M
- ISBN-139780674055162
- OCLC Control Number756837057
- OCLC Control Numbertwentyfiveyearso0000fors
- Library of Congress Control Number2011040581
Classifications
- DDC193
- LCCB2798 .F6713 2012
Description
Kant declared that philosophy began in 1781 with his Critique of Pure Reason. In 1806 Hegel announced that philosophy had now been completed. Eckart Förster examines the reasons behind these claims and assesses the steps that led in such a short time from Kant's "(Bbeginning" to Hegel's "(Bend." He concludes that, in an unexpected yet significant sense, both Kant and Hegel were indeed right. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy follows the unfolding of a key idea during this exceptionally productive period: the Kantian idea that philosophy can be scientific and, consequently, can be completed. Förster's study combines historical research with philosophical insight and leads him to propose a new thesis. The development of Kant's transcendental philosophy in his three Critiques, Förster claims, resulted in a fundamental distinction between "(Bintellectual intuition" and "(Bintuitive understanding." Overlooked until now, this distinction yields two takes on how to pursue philosophy as science after Kant. One line of thought culminates in Fichte's theory of freedom (Wissenschaftslehre), while the other--and here Förster brings Goethe's significance to the fore--results in Goethe's transformation of the Kantian idea of an intuitive understanding in light of Spinoza's third kind of knowledge. Both strands are brought together in Hegel and propel his split from Schelling. Förster's work makes an original contribution to our understanding of the classical era of German philosophy--an expanding interest within the Anglophone philosophical community.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!