Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume bridge abutments
Our rough guess is there are 28,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 1 hours and 55 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 4 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Iowa State University. Center for Earthworks Engineering Research - Contributor
- Iowa. Highway Research Board - Contributor
- Iowa. Department of Transportation - Contributor
Publication
2012 - Center for Earthworks Engineering Research, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, Iowa
Language
English
Word Count
28,750 words, Guess
Page Count
115 pages
Identifiers
- Library of Congress Control Number2013412390
- OCLC Control Number779490585
- Open LibraryOL30946363M
Classifications
- LCCTG325 .G46 2012
Description
This report presents a review of literature on geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments, and test results and analysis from two field demonstration projects (Bridge 1 and Bridge 2) conducted in Buchanan County, Iowa, to evaluate the feasibility and cost effectiveness of the use of GRS bridge abutments on low volume roads (LVRs). The two projects included GRS abutment substructure and railroad flat car (RRFC) bridge superstructure. The construction costs varied from $43k to $49k, which was about 50 to 60% lower than the expected costs for building a conventional bridge. Settlement monitoring at both bridges indicated maximum settlements less than 1 in. during the monitoring phase. Laboratory testing on GRS fill material, field testing, and in ground instrumentation, abutment settlement monitoring, and bridge live load (LL) testing were conducted on Bridge 2. Laboratory testing on aggregate fill with and without geosynthetic material showed improvements in shear strength parameters and permanent deformation behavior when reinforced with geosynthetic due to lateral restraint effect at the soil-geosynthetic interface. Bridge LL testing under static loads indicated maximum deflections close to 0.9 in and non-uniform deflections transversely across the bridge due to poor load transfer between RRFCs. The ratio of horizontal to vertical stresses in the GRS fill was lo3 (less than 0.25), indicating low lateral stress on the soil surrounding GRS fill material. Bearing capacity analysis at Bridge 2 indicated lower than recommended factor of safety (FS) values due to low ultimate reinforcement strength of the geosynthetic material used in this study and relatively weak underlying foundation layer. Global stability analysis of the GRS abutment structure revealed lower FS than recommended against sliding failure along the interface of the GRS fill material and the underlying weak foundation layer. Design and construction recommendations to help improve the stability and performance of the GRS abutment structures on future projects are provided in this report.
Subjects
Topics
Places
Links
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!