Saving persuasion
rhetoric and judgment in political thought
Our rough guess is there are 72,500 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 50 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 10 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Publication
2006 - Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
72,500 words, Guess
Page Count
290 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL3428300M
- ISBN-100674021681
- OCLC Control Number61478816
- OCLC Control Numbersavingpersuasion00gars
- Library of Congress Control Number2005052757
and 2 more
- Goodreads97689
- LibraryThing926533
Classifications
- DDC320.01/4
- LCCJA85 .G38 2006
Description
"In today's increasingly polarized political landscape, it seems that fewer and fewer citizens hold out hope of persuading one another. Even among those who have not given up on persuasion, few will admit to practicing the art of persuasion known as rhetoric. To describe political speech as "rhetoric" today is to accuse it of being superficial or manipulative. In Saving Persuasion, Bryan Garsten uncovers the early modern origins of this suspicious attitude toward rhetoric and seeks to loosen its grip on contemporary political theory. Revealing how deeply concerns about rhetorical speech shaped both ancient and modern political thought, he argues that the artful practice of persuasion ought to be viewed as a crucial part of democratic politics. He suggests that the aspects of rhetoric that seem most dangerous - the appeals to emotion, religious values, and the concrete commitments and identities of particular communities - are also those which can draw out citizens' capacity for good judgment. Against theorists who advocate a rationalized ideal of deliberation aimed at consensus, Garsten argues that a controversial politics of partiality and passion can produce a more engaged and more deliberative kind of democratic discourse."--Jacket.
Subjects
Topics
Other Editions
- Saving persuasion: rhetoric and judgment in political thought
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!